Community Links

Community Links blog

Posts Tagged ‘Welfare to work’

Tackling Working Age Poverty

Friday, May 21st, 2010


by Gary Blake
Today is the end of my first week in post as Co-ordinator for the  Tackling Working Age Poverty project. Community Links, in partnership with Church Action on Poverty, are working on a national campaign to research and address working age poverty.

I hope over the coming months to listen to people’s views and hear your ideas on how we can make a difference for people experiencing working age poverty.

Yesterday DWP published the latest set of statistics revealing the extent of poverty in the UK.  Several commentators have analysed the figures including New Policy Institute co-founder Peter Kenway whose article in today’s Guardian reports that six in every 10 children in poverty now belong to a working household and in-work poverty has been a rising trend since the late 1970’s.

He says “Work that does not provide a sufficient income is now as much to blame for poverty than worklessness.”

We are taking a close look at working-age poverty over the coming year.  As part of this campaign we are organising listening events around the country. Now is an opportunity to see how serious the new government is about poverty reduction. If you want to get involved in our campaign, leave your comments below or send me an e-mail.

£5 earnings cap traps people on benefits

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Today saw the launch of our Need Not Greed campaign’s demand for the earnings limit on Jobseekers Allowance to go up from £5 to £50. It was discussed on the Today Programme (mp3), and Nicola Smith of the TUC gave a great interview on BBC Radio 5 Breakfast (mp3).

People on JSA face a £5 cap (or ‘earnings disregard’) on the amount they can keep each week when they get any kind of paid work. Above this amount, benefits are deducted at the same rate as earnings, which means claimants who take on part time or occasional work are often little better off.

Our experience shows that this low cap on earnings often removes the incentive to take the first step back into work and can push people into illegal cash-in-hand jobs.

The £5 cap was set in 1988 and has never been raised. We argue that raising it to £50 a week would immediately allow people on JSA an easier route back into work. It would allow them to take on a few hours of temporary work to build up experience, and give people more flexibility when moving off benefits.

At the moment, many people getting these kinds of jobs do not tell the jobcentre, knowing that doing so would jeopardise their income. In doing so however, they’re breaking the law.

However, increasing the Earnings Disregard alone is not enough. We’re asking for this now as a measure which could be quickly implemented and make a large difference to the lives of people trying to move off JSA. In the end nothing but a complete overhaul of the benefits system would really allow people to make that smooth transistion off benefits and into work.

To find out more, you can download a briefing paper about the campaign or visit the Need NOT Greed website.

Just the beginning for welfare reform

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Despite the Welfare Reform Bill passing into a law a couple of weeks ago, there seems fairly universal acceptance that there’s still a lot of welfare reforming to be done (including, some would argue, undoing the damage done by the most recent set of reforms).

The questions left are around the direction of future reform, its scale, and its timing.

Is it going to be, as Faisel Rahman persuasively argues it should in today’s Guardian, positive reform – harnessing people’s desire for work, treating people on benefits as contributors, removing the barriers in the current system? Or is it going to be negative, increasingly punitive and stigmatising towards those on benefits?

Will it happen piecemeal – raising the earnings disregard one year, changing the rules for lone parents on Jobseekers Allowance the next? Or will there be wholesale reform, like that proposed by the Centre for Social Justice?

And will it happen in a few months, a few years, or a few slow decades? We’d certainly like to see some immediate smaller changes that this government could still bring in and which would make a big difference – we’ll be saying more about that next week. But in the long run we’re hoping, and arguing, for the need for wholesale, positive reform of the system.

Thoughts on Getting Britain Working from inside the Conservative conference

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

I’ve spent a fascinating couple of days discussing welfare reform at Conservative conference, meeting some of the people leading Conservative welfare policy and talking to them about the experiences of people trying to get off benefits and into work in Newham. A few thoughts so far…

Publicly, Conservatives are talking about their new Work Programme – bringing together various welfare-to-work schemes into one programme. We were disappointed that this didn’t include recognition of the way the benefits system needs to change, so it’s reassuring that Iain Duncan Smith’s report from a couple of weeks ago is still being widely discussed here. Indeed, there are rumours that David Freud – the architect of this weeks proposals – is receptive to IDS’ plans, so there’s still hope that future proposals will address the problems in the benefits system.

The Conservative leadership knows it needs to appear tough, to appeal to voters (sad, but seemingly true at the moment). They also know they cannot announce a new programme costing £4bn in the midst of a conference focused on cuts. Nevertheless, there are hopeful signs that benefit reform – helping people progress off benefits into work – is still on the agenda.

Finally, it has been nice to see real discussions around the most excluded, with people accepting that no-one is too ‘hard to reach’. And Freud seems pretty determined, now as a Conservative, not to give up on welfare reform as’ being too hard to fix’. Well our message is perhaps that the benefits system is not ‘too hard-to-fix’ either. You just need to make sure you listen to those who know best – people on benefits.

Welfare: fit for purpose? Benefits and employment

Friday, August 21st, 2009

Image Credit: The Guardian

Benefit Busters was shown last night on Channel 4, questioning how to get lone parents off benefits when they are financially better off not working. It was the job of Hayley Taylor to find the answer, and she did this through her A4E Elevate course aiming to build single mothers’ confidence to get them back into the labour market. Or, was she bullying a group of slightly vulnerable mums, some of which had serious issues of debt and possible drink addictions, and neither of which Hayley had any professional qualifications in what so ever? I haven’t quite figured out what A4E stands for yet but it could be something to do with Accident and Emergency.

On the whole there were a number of job successes, and possibly one career success - that belonging to Hayley herself. I am still trying to figure out who benefited from this programme. It was apparent that the mothers were eager but profoundly lacking in confidence, it was apparent that the system was completely flawed but no Goverment Minister was interviewed as to why the current welfare reform bill hasn’t addressed the existing disincentives. It was also apparent that what the most vulnerable really need is intensive support, professional advice and guidance but instead they got ‘tough love.’

With the latest unemployment figures at a shocking 2.44 million, an increase of 220,000 in the past three months to June 2009 and talk of the real figure being 6 million getting the reform of the welfare system right is more important now than ever. The Jobcentre Plus is possibly the most popular venue in town right now; with a noticeable increase in the range of customers, and therefore an increase in the range of skills and capacity required by the staff, placing a heavy burden on Jobcentre Plus staff.

Current reforms mean government are employing large private organisations like A4E to deal with the long-term unemployed whilst they get to grips with the latest recession wave of white collar workers. The BBC Radio 4 programme “Face the Facts, the JCP isn’t working“, aired last Sunday interviewed people recently made redundant, people with impressive CVs and keen to find employment yet they were completely let down by the JCP service.  The same frustrations voiced in this programme were echoed by the long term unemployed in our report Working Alongside.

Welfare must be a first class service for all: capable of responding to the needs of a varying population before it can justify imposing threats like benefit sanctions or sending people to boot camps.

We spoke to Guardian journalist Jenni Russell and yesterday in her article in the Guardian she eloquently and accurately pointed out that errors in the current, outdated and rigid system and poor quality, low paid, erratic employment is the problem, ‘the solution is nothing less that a rethinking of the welfare system fit for the 21st Century’, because, as Hayley concluded ‘the systems not right; it just seems backwards really’

DWP select committee one off evidence session into Child Poverty

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

 
Following the Budget 2009 announcements the DWP select committee held a one off evidence session in June to evaluate how effective Government initiatives are in (i) breaking cycles of intergenerational worklessness and (ii) assisting out of poverty families in these groups who cannot work and whether the Government is doing enough to support  parents into sustainable employment. (Watch it here) It also assessed the effectiveness of cross-government co-ordination to address child poverty  and referred to the Take up Challenge report  . Need NOT Greed submitted evidence to the session drawn from a series of Need NOT Greed workshops based in Bromley and organised by a group of lone parent, grassroots campaigners, from Maison Enterprises.

As the theme for the Child Poverty Bill is making the most of your potential, Need NOT Greed thought it relevant to submit evidence about helping lone parents out of poverty and harnessing informal economic activity to create sustainable self employment. This is a suitable option for lone parents with childcare concerns who have an entrepreneurial ability. Yet as Faisel Rahman, director of Fair Finance points out in his regular colum ‘Becoming an entrepreneur is a tall order for someone on the breadline’  and that ‘the biggest barrier seems to be the harsh benefits system’ However, with the right support he gives the example of Jannet who started trading informally and now is off the benefits system-and paying taxes.

Around the same time there was an article in the Guardian ‘Fraught in a trap’ where Amelia Gentleman highlighted the misdiagnosis made by the architects of the current Welfare Reform which proposes that people are work shy and that punitive measures is the best approach to take to get people back to work. Amelia interviewed two lone parents who expressed their desire to be employed in a job that did not keep them in poverty and the unnecessary pressures they felt coming from JCP advisers when there was not adequate childcare available.
From the workshops we ran in Bromley and the evidence submitted is apparent that for this group of single parents motivation is certainly not the problem, the benefits system is.

“We need to invest in our future and our children are our future. Poverty means that our children have to cope with things that they wouldn’t normally have to, it makes them grow up much faster. Tensions with the JCP adviser have a knock on effect with the kids.”

To offer families a real route out of poverty government policy needs to recognise the efforts people are already making to work and build on this activity through supportive and progressive measures. Need NOT Greed hopes to participate in more evidence sessions by government to tackle poverty, effectively reform the welfare system and look at harnessing informal work in the UK as a way to break the cycle of worklessness. Get in touch if you are intersted in getting involved in our Need NOT Greed workshops or have ideas about giving future evidence.

Download the transcript of the select committee hearing and the evidence we submitted here

Cash-in- hand questionnaire

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

As part of our continuing research into the informal economy we want to investigate the impact of the last 12 months of recession on informal economic activity or cash-in-hand trading. 

This survey is being carried out as part of our Need NOT Greed campaign aiming to move people out of poverty, off benefits and into work.

Please help us by completing a short online survey.

“Working Alongside”: Community Links and ATD Fourth World’s ‘Need NOT Greed’ discussion groups on the Benefit System

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

Working together for a better future for everyone

“People who experience a problem understand it best.” 

Extract from Community Links’ founding statement

 

Community Links and ATD Fourth World, are two charities both working with people who live in poverty. We jointly conducted a series of workshops with people who have long-term experience of poverty to explore their experiences, draw out common themes and develop ideas for changes to the system that participants felt would help them move out of poverty, off benefits and into sustainable secure employment.  

These are the stories of the people we work with everyday. They are the ones who have to queue for 40 minutes in the Jobcentre, the ones who never see the same member of staff twice, and the ones who have to negotiate the bureaucracy of the benefits system just to be able to feed their families whilst they look for work in this ongoing recession.

Working Alongside“ is the latest in our Evidence Paper series. It is an account of those three workshops and some recommendations. We hope policymakers and other practioners will learn from this work  to inform their strategy and policy and go on to improve services offered by the Department for Work and Pensions, Jobcentre Plus and their partners.

Download a copy of “Working Alongside“.

Recession and supporting people back into work

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

busy day's mass punchingEarlier this week, I attended a TUC seminar focusing on the lessons from the last two recessions in the 1980’s and 90’s. Evidence from the ILO and ONS confirms that this recession is severe – nothing surprising there.

The TUC’s useful work on the recession including reports and the ToUChstone blog describes and comments upon the changing nature of this recession.

 As TUC Senior Policy Officer Richard Excel explained “predicting the future is a mugs game”, however unemployment is expected to continue to rise, maybe even to 3.5m, well after an upturn in GDP (the green shoots of the recovery). That’s typical, as is the fact that it will take years for the economy to recover to pre-recession levels of growth. The hardest hit being the lowest skilled and those in the most deprived areas, which is tough for the people we work with in east London as they are over represented in these categories.

Professor Paul Gregg (of DWP Conditionality and Support report fame) then gave an interesting analysis of factors that might reduce disconnection with the (formal) labour market and those who are long term unemployed.

Evidence shows that what works to reduce this disconnection are back to work intervention programmes which: 

  • Offer active support in getting job ready, acquiring the skills and experience to get a job e.g. job search, CV skills, job interview practice.
  • Provide a paid job with work which is valuable to the community – Paul suggested setting up community job banks – not picking up litter but doing youth work, child care etc…
  • Focus on getting the individual a job at the end of the programme – both the individual and the organisation where that individual is placed must be focused on finding them a job. 

This approach is currently applied (with varying degrees of success) in the New Deal programmes but the stages are followed sequentially. Paul suggests doing all three stages at the same time. His suggested intervention programme is called the Job Guarantee, check here for more details. In effect he’s attempting to mainstream Intermediate Labour Markets (ILMs).

If you’re a regular reader of our blog you might be thinking that this all seems familiar. Well you’re right. It is. Our Community Allowance proposes the same thing but opens up the offer to more people, not just the long term unemployed. We’ve been campaigning for many years to get government to make the link between unemployment, work and community regeneration, which were a part of the Community Programmes of the 1970s and 80s. It’s funny how things go full circle. 

We have a meeting with the DWP’s Right to Bid Team this Friday to discuss further details about how we might pilot the Community Allowance across the UK. We’re also following up with Paul Gregg to see how we might connect.

I’ll let you know how it goes.

Supporting Young People into work

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Community Links has been running a community development course for several years. When the course units are successfully completed, students receive a National Open College Network Level 3 Progression Certificate: Community Development Skills.

The students come from a wide variety of cultural, social, and age backgrounds, and for many of them this is their first experience of an academic course since they left school. Students are encouraged to work together, sharing their knowledge, helping and supporting each other.

This year nine students took part in the research unit as part of the course. It is Community Links’ policy to make the research relevant to their wider work and also relevant to students’ experience. This year’s topic, Supporting young people into work was an interesting and engaging one for the students to work on, given the recession. At all stages the students were consulted and supported in the work. The result was a well-written and thoughtful report with some very interesting conclusions. You can download a copy here.

Many of the students who complete the course find that this module is the most helpful of all the modules on the course, and of most use to them if they are going on to further academic qualifications, which many of them do. Staff have found that students benefit from the practical experience of designing and implementing the research with a qualified researcher from our in house research and policy team linksUK, and also from working in a group to write up the report.

 The students spoke briefly about their experience here:

The great strength of this way of teaching and learning is its practicality and relevance to the lives of the students, and the confidence and skills they gain from working on a research project such as this.

Download this year’s report here and read about last year’s report “Cash-in-hand and working rights for young people” .

If you’re interested in either of our courses in ‘Welfare Benefits Advice’ and ‘Community Development Work’, which are accredited by National Open College Network, then please contact Doreen Jules-Lewis or Cwti Green on 020 7473 9667.