Community Links

Community Links blog

Posts Tagged ‘TUC’

Employment rights are key to reducing in-work poverty

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Nicola Smith is a Senior Policy Officer at the TUC, who launched their Fair Work campaign last week.

The UK is currently moving out of the deepest recession since the Second World War. Hundreds of thousands of people have lost their jobs, and many remain at risk of long-term worklessness. Continued government support to help people move into work is vital.

But unemployment is not the only challenge facing post-recession Britain, as work itself is not always a route out of poverty: increasing proportions of working households have an income of below 60 per cent of median income (the Government’s preferred measure of poverty), and nearly half of poor children are in working families.

(more…)

Recession and supporting people back into work

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

busy day's mass punchingEarlier this week, I attended a TUC seminar focusing on the lessons from the last two recessions in the 1980’s and 90’s. Evidence from the ILO and ONS confirms that this recession is severe – nothing surprising there.

The TUC’s useful work on the recession including reports and the ToUChstone blog describes and comments upon the changing nature of this recession.

 As TUC Senior Policy Officer Richard Excel explained “predicting the future is a mugs game”, however unemployment is expected to continue to rise, maybe even to 3.5m, well after an upturn in GDP (the green shoots of the recovery). That’s typical, as is the fact that it will take years for the economy to recover to pre-recession levels of growth. The hardest hit being the lowest skilled and those in the most deprived areas, which is tough for the people we work with in east London as they are over represented in these categories.

Professor Paul Gregg (of DWP Conditionality and Support report fame) then gave an interesting analysis of factors that might reduce disconnection with the (formal) labour market and those who are long term unemployed.

Evidence shows that what works to reduce this disconnection are back to work intervention programmes which: 

  • Offer active support in getting job ready, acquiring the skills and experience to get a job e.g. job search, CV skills, job interview practice.
  • Provide a paid job with work which is valuable to the community – Paul suggested setting up community job banks – not picking up litter but doing youth work, child care etc…
  • Focus on getting the individual a job at the end of the programme – both the individual and the organisation where that individual is placed must be focused on finding them a job. 

This approach is currently applied (with varying degrees of success) in the New Deal programmes but the stages are followed sequentially. Paul suggests doing all three stages at the same time. His suggested intervention programme is called the Job Guarantee, check here for more details. In effect he’s attempting to mainstream Intermediate Labour Markets (ILMs).

If you’re a regular reader of our blog you might be thinking that this all seems familiar. Well you’re right. It is. Our Community Allowance proposes the same thing but opens up the offer to more people, not just the long term unemployed. We’ve been campaigning for many years to get government to make the link between unemployment, work and community regeneration, which were a part of the Community Programmes of the 1970s and 80s. It’s funny how things go full circle. 

We have a meeting with the DWP’s Right to Bid Team this Friday to discuss further details about how we might pilot the Community Allowance across the UK. We’re also following up with Paul Gregg to see how we might connect.

I’ll let you know how it goes.

TUC: challenging poverty – the media and politicians

Thursday, November 6th, 2008

bw.jpg hannah by you.The TUC conference Challenge Povertyism on the 17th October  included a workshop from our Need NOT Greed campaign: challenging perceptions of people working cash-in-hand. Povertyism has been defined as discrimination against people experiencing poverty, negative attitudes to people experiencing poverty and as Professor Ruth Lister describes ‘Othering’  In all these interpretations  the media and politicians have a responsibility and a role to play in eradicating poverty in the UK.

Poverty in the UK does not gain substantial coverage in the news, on documentaries or in the press. Yet there are numerous anti-poverty organisations campaigning to eradicate poverty, over 130 turned up for the End Child Poverty Rally on the 4th October.  There is increasing dialogue between such organisations and government around how we can eradicate poverty in the UK. There is a lot less dialogue between politicians and people actually living in poverty, families trapped in the benefits system or the most vulnerable who are completely cut-off from any support from the state.

This absent dialogue is so important for two reasons. Firstly to make sure to make sure government is on the right track and has a sound understanding of the complexity of poverty. Secondly and most importantly so that people living poverty are participating in the process of eradicating poverty and can be actively involve in creating change. For any policy changes to work and be effective we must break down the barriers between society, government and people living in poverty. For a participatory approach read Voices for a Change   and  Communicating Poverty Report.

There is an increasing interest in a partnership between the media and people living in poverty in the UK: watch this video.  We will be attending similar events over the coming months to form better relations with the media and establish a more informed understanding of working cash-in-hand. We will also be working more closely with politicians and influencing policy makers. At the conference we launched our report on MPs understanding of working cash-in-hand.
The Need NOT Greed campaign seeks to involve people working cash-in-hand in the decision making process and work with the media to create better understanding in society.

To find out more … or to get involved:
contact maeve.mcgoldrick@community-links.org

 

TUC: Commission on Vulnerable Employment

Wednesday, May 14th, 2008

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) Commission on Vulnerable Employment recently published its final report ‘Hard Work, Hidden Lives’. I went along to the launch as we gave evidence in person to the Commission last summer, primarily about our work on the informal economy and its relationship to poverty.

Our 2006 report ‘People in low-paid informal work: Need not Greed’, supported by JRF , describes how, on one hand informal paid work takes people out of ‘absolute’ poverty enabling them to pay for some of the basics in life like being able to feed the family, and pay off the debt collector knocking at the door; but on the other hand informal paid work can trap people in ‘relative’ poverty. Leaving them outside the mainstream without access to the national minimum wage, insurance, health and safety, or holiday or sick pay.

The TUC’s report is right to focus on the appalling exploitation of over two million vulnerable workers across the UK. They are the hidden workforce, which is the backbone of our economy, in low-paid and insecure work where mistreatment is common. These people are care-home workers, cleaners, factory workers, hotels and restaurant staff, hairdressers, construction workers and security staff, they are being paid far below the national minimum wage, in poor (and at times dangerous) working conditions,  not covered by insurance or health and safety laws, exploited by unscrupulous employers and physically or verbally abused and bullied… the list goes on.

The report includes powerful case studies illustrating  the experiences of far too many people working in terrible circumstances.

Whilst employers can be exploitative, there are some benefits to informal paid work, which we shouldn’t lose sight of. Informal jobs enable those facing barriers to formal work to access employment. They also helped people to find a solution to temporary crises.

Many people who we’ve talked to over the last eight years identify a range of benefits, other than income, including increased confidence, skills and work experience, and potential pathways into formal work. There are also family, community and social benefits from informal paid work, including increased social cohesion.

Pick up a copy of the TUC report and read it. I commend it to you.

Download the report from CoVE website.

Have you experienced poor conditions in unregulated workplaces? Please add your comments here.