Community Links

Community Links blog

Posts Tagged ‘employment’

Olympics must live up to their promise of a rejuvenated east London

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

Olympicbuilding2The 2012 Olympics – just two years away – were won for east London on the strength of a story about their potential to transform one of the most deprived areas in the UK. The preparations are going well, as the buildings go up on time and within budget, Stratford station readies itself for the arrival of Eurostar, and Europe’s largest urban shopping centre takes shape next door at Westfield. It looks like the games themselves will be a huge success.

The danger, as always, is that those with least to start with – often those that come through the door of Community Links – end up no better off. On the Today programme this morning, Newham’s Mayor Sir Robin Wales spoke up for 18,000 people in Newham who have never had a job, and it was pointed out that so far only 4% of the construction jobs on the Olympic site have gone to previously unemployed east Londoners.

Last week I went to a talk about the Olympics, given by an incredibly enthusiastic Newham Council employee. We were on top of a tower block not far from the site, with a group of young jobseekers on our back-to-work scheme. The views were fantastic, but many of the young people felt like it was a long way away. Shahid told me:

“I’m looking forward to watching it on telly, and coming down to Stratford to see the atmosphere. There’s going to be a lot of different people coming from all over the world – it’ll be nice. Job wise, Jobcentres all talk about it, but there’s not much information. I don’t know what the first step is. The only thing I’ve done is go into Newham volunteers. I haven’t heard of anyone getting a job. It hasn’t had any impact – I’ve got lots of friends and families around this area, I’ve lived here my whole life, and I haven’t got any connections with anyone who’s involved in the Olympics. “

When east London won the bid, we hoped people from Newham would be running the Olympics and running in the Olympics, not just picking up litter. Yet even litter picking is proving an elusive aim. Developers find it hard to recruit and retrain young local people who have often not been employed before. As the Mayor pointed out, this should be a spur to providing more intensive in-work support, overcoming these hurdles, not abandoning Newham’s youngsters altogether. Our recent research with young unemployed people in Newham showed that young people overwhelmingly want to work, but are held back by a lack of jobs and a lack of proper support.

If the new houses being built on the Olympic site are filled with people moving in to the area, and the jobs at Westfield don’t go to local jobseekers, then a once in a generation opportunity will have been lost. Tower Hamlets residents saw almost no gain from the development of Canary Wharf, as the much heralded but deeply unambitious ‘trickle down’ benefits to local people failed to materialise. The rhetoric around the Olympics has been much more positive, but there’s still a way to go before it becomes a reality.

We hope that in the Autumn of 2012, you will we be able to stop every resident in the five Olympic Boroughs, ask them ‘how did the Olympics impact on you?’, and get an enthusiastically positive response – whether it’s a new house, a new job, new shopping opportunities, new attitude to sports and healthy living, or just a new and positive experience. That would be a truly powerful legacy, but there’s a lot of work to do before it’s realised.

New ‘neets’ research challenges ‘layabouts’ label

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Window Image Last week the Audit Commission’s “Against the Odds” report revealed that Young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) at 16-18 have poorer life chances than their peers and are more likely to be a long term cost to public finances.

In a time of austerity, government can ill-afford the estimated £13 billion in public finance costs that will be incurred by the 2008 NEET cohort over their lifetimes. The blight on individual lives is even more appalling, young men who were NEET are three times more likely to suffer from depression, and five times more likely to have a criminal record, than their peers.

This week Community Links publish our new survey of young people not in employment, education or training. Our research suggests that the vast majority want a job and are actively looking for work.  All but two of thirty five NEET young interviewed were keen to work and actively looking for a job. A significant number were also highly qualified but struggling to find work in an increasingly competitive employment market.

“I’ve applied for loads of jobs but I’m up against people with lots more experience who are going for the same jobs as me,” said one young man with ten GCSEs, three ‘A’ levels and a BSC in Computing and Business. “I’ve been to graduate careers fairs where I’m competing for entry level positions with people who have been made redundant from Lehman Brothers and other big firms. It’s incredibly hard to get your foot on the ladder.”

The label NEET covers a diverse group; whilst just over a quarter of the young people interviewed had five or more grade A-C GCSE’s, a similar number had no qualifications at all. More than half of those with no qualifications had been excluded from school.

Only half of the young people who took part in the survey were claiming benefits, relying instead on support from family and friends. The absence of the most basic level of financial support made it extremely difficult for some to stay in education.  One 17 year old described how he had enrolled on a full time course but could not find the £20 per week needed to pay his travel costs. Poverty had a big impact; there have recently been calls to reduce or cut benefits for young people who refuse work or training. But a lack of cash is the very thing causing some young people to fail. Some who simply could not afford the cost of travelling to college, for instance, were abandoning education as a result. One 20 year old woman described how she had been unable to complete a Business Studies degree because she was sharing a two bedroom flat with eight other family members. “Five of us sleep in one room,” she said. “There was just nowhere to work or think and after 18 months I had to leave the course.”

Others from poor backgrounds were giving up on higher education because they were afraid they would be unable to repay high levels of debt accrued to cover tuition fees and living costs.

A more generous level of support for young people in education and training could cut the risk of young people becoming unemployed for extended periods, and reduce the long term cost to society. Taking away financial support by cutting benefits or other punitive measures is likely to have precisely the opposite effect to that intended and lead to greater demands on public finances in the long term.

Read the full report.

Welfare reform proposals get a mixed reaction from the most successful New Deal project in London

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

New Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Iain Duncan Smith’s welfare reform announcements today (and his simultaneous Guardian charm offensive) get a mixed reaction from colleagues around Community Links who, amongst other things, run the most successful New Deal project – supporting long-term unemployed back into work – in London and the South East.

On the one hand, we’ve been calling for wholesale reform of the benefits system for many years, so it’s good to see him demanding it too. His recognition of the problem of work incentives in the benefit system – whereby people can end up worse off and less secure on taking a low-paid job – is welcome.

The benefits system needs to be designed so people can take stepping stones into well paid and secure work, rather than leaving them high and dry as soon as a temporary and low-paid job appears. Equally, it must be ready to pick them up again quickly if the job ends, both to prevent the cycle of debt that often begins in that few weeks between the last pay cheque and the first benefit cheque, and to give people the reassurance that taking the job in the first place won’t jeopardise their situation further down the line. Whether he can get these large and expensive reforms through the Treasury remains to be seen.

However, his continuing adherence to the idea of sanctions for ‘those who won’t work’ is worrying. We know that even the long-term unemployed want to work, but some face many and complex barriers – lack of training or education, lack of support at the Jobcentre, health or family problems. For some, it takes several cycles through our six month programme before they’re in a position to accept a job. Cutting their benefits after the first cycle will plunge them further into poverty and further from the job market, costing more, and stigmatising where government should be supporting.

Finally, the Work Programme model – whereby charities like ours (and private contractors) take on more of a role in supporting people into work – has good aspects, not least the ‘black box approach’ that would let us design bespoke programmes for individual jobseekers. Yet the signs are that, by making the contracts so big that only large multinational companies can apply, they will lose the unique contribution a charity like ours can make to supporting the long-term unemployed. The system will need to be carefully designed, and properly funded, to make sure this doesn’t happen.

Overall, much of the rhetoric – punishments and stigmatisation aside – sounds promising, but the detail is still not there. At the launch this morning Duncan Smith said he wanted to work with charities like ours to hammer out the detail over the next few months. If this is a genuine offer then we are very willing to help him shape the system so that it best serves the needs of the two thousand jobseekers we see every year, the tens of thousands in Newham, and the millions nationwide.

Tackling Working Age Poverty

Friday, May 21st, 2010


by Gary Blake
Today is the end of my first week in post as Co-ordinator for the  Tackling Working Age Poverty project. Community Links, in partnership with Church Action on Poverty, are working on a national campaign to research and address working age poverty.

I hope over the coming months to listen to people’s views and hear your ideas on how we can make a difference for people experiencing working age poverty.

Yesterday DWP published the latest set of statistics revealing the extent of poverty in the UK.  Several commentators have analysed the figures including New Policy Institute co-founder Peter Kenway whose article in today’s Guardian reports that six in every 10 children in poverty now belong to a working household and in-work poverty has been a rising trend since the late 1970’s.

He says “Work that does not provide a sufficient income is now as much to blame for poverty than worklessness.”

We are taking a close look at working-age poverty over the coming year.  As part of this campaign we are organising listening events around the country. Now is an opportunity to see how serious the new government is about poverty reduction. If you want to get involved in our campaign, leave your comments below or send me an e-mail.

How to tackle poverty – ideas so far…

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Tackling poverty and unemployment are going to be dominant themes of the upcoming election. This week we’ve asked a group of experts – not just academics and policy staff but also people experiencing these issues for themselves – what change would make the most difference in reducing poverty amongst adults.

The 12 million people living in poverty in the UK are split roughly half and half between those in working households, and those in households where no one works.

(more…)

It is time to end the madness of taxing the poor

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Jonty Olliff-Cooper leads the Progressive Conservatism Project at Demos.

Ending the folly of directly taxing people on very low wages would be the best single poverty fighting measure the next government could take.

In-work poverty is as prevalent as workless poverty, yet it receives far less media and political attention.  In-work poverty’s ‘share’ of total child poverty is now 50 per cent.  Prior to the recession, there was no sustained fall in in-work child poverty either over the entire period since Thatcher’s premiership, or over the active lifetime of the present government’s anti-poverty drive.

(more…)

The importance of good quality jobs

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Chris Goulden is the Policy and Research manager at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation who are launching a new project looking at the future of the labour market and how it might impact on poverty. It’s a perfect start to today’s debate -  on why so many people are working but still in poverty.

People who aren’t children or pensioners are a mixed bunch. There are between 5½ and 7½ million people of working age in poverty in the UK, depending on what measure you want to use.  Of these:

- Nearly one in five is aged 55+ with no dependent children.
- One in nine is of ‘Asian or Asian British’ ethnicity.
- Only one in twenty is a young parent aged 16 to 24.
- One in three has a disabled adult or child in their household.
- Single childless women have experienced the biggest rise in their risk of poverty over the last ten years; single parents have experienced the biggest fall.

(more…)

The media doesn’t show people like me

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Chris Gayle-Dalton is 24, grew up in Newham and now lives nearby. He volunteers for Community Links and is a trainee Community Organiser with Novis Scarman.

I saw this headline “Welcome to Britain, land of the rising scum….We’ve cornered the market on welfare layabouts, drug addicts and feral gangs.” And I thought, that’s not like us. It’s like they’re trying to say we’re like the US – the guns, the crime. You have got bad people in Britain, like everywhere else, but you’ve always got to look at all the other good people, who do stuff for the world, who help other people.

Like charity events, fundraising for homeless people, mums struggling who need stuff for their kids, parents who can’t take their kids to school, all the other kids who are helping, volunteering.

Even when there are problems, it’s usually more complicated than the media show. Parents who lose their kids to social services, go to homeless shelters, and when they get back on their feet their kids don’t want to know them.

Take my experience – I’ve done bad things in my life but I actually sat down and said to myself I need to change. I thought to myself yeah, I can change my life, look where I am now. I’m actually working, not earning that much but still living, supporting my family, and my family supports me. But the media doesn’t show people like me.

You need to give people chances in their life, at least one chance. Sometimes the media doesn’t do that.

Once more on the visible poor

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Neil Robertson blogs at The Bleeding Heart Show and has kindly allowed us to reproduce this post from there. It follows on from his earlier (and excellent) post on The Visible Poor.

At 12pm on the West Orchards Terrace, Coventry sits down to eat. Where Alan Bennett might’ve found pleasure watching the manners and habits of people in hotel lobbies, I’ve always found mine in the more modest surrounds of the shopping centre food court. I like watching people negotiate the different choices on offer & mulling over where to sit; the things they do while they’re eating and the ways they interact with each other.

Just in front of me, there’s a dad reading a football magazine to his young son, who, awestruck and imagining, quietly slips chips between his lips. A woman from the Debenhams make-up counter hurriedly stuffs a wrap into her mouth whilst tapping frantically on her phone. Two elderly women tuck into their ‘giant’ Yorkshire puddings, pausing occasionally to coo over a baby in a high chair. An adolescent couple, presumably on their first date, eat together in silence; cautious not to do or say anything which could cause embarrassment.

There are pizzas and pasties, cappucinos and fried chicken, toasted teacakes & ciabattas. Yet all this difference is nothing compared to the range of people you’ll find. There are smart suits and shell suits, hoodies and cardigans, short skirts, jeans, leather jackets and niqabs, and they all ventured up the escalators for coffee or food, or just to have five minutes off their feet. This is why I’ve never understood people who dismiss shopping centres as cathedrals for commerce; they can be some of the most human places on the planet.

What a lot of socialists don’t often mention is that insofar as capitalism functions – falteringly, and with innumerable inequities – it does so because the people make it function. This isn’t just because of coercion, necessity or false consciousness, but because humans have a remarkable capacity to bend the rigid, humdrum formalities of working life into something more humane.

A security guard goes over to talk to the girl who’s getting bored at her unpopular hotdog stand. Two cleaners share a joke by one of the bins. In the queue for coffee, the harassed barista still found time for banter with one of her regulars. We all find ways to endure the long shift, adapt to the tedious routine, amend the unfathomable rules: we have in-jokes, fag breaks, staff competitions and nights out. Work disciplines us, yes, but we’re the ones who civilise work, and the skills we develop help us to be better employees and better members of society.

The root cause of our gravest social problems is not big government, the welfare state, or even broken families. It is lack of work. When unemployment becomes long term, even generational, many of the values and behaviours which work develops begins to disappear. In its place are anti-social behaviours which can cause misery to otherwise upstanding working class communities. Worse still, these behaviours are then learned by their children, creating a cycle of state dependency, social exclusion, violence and abuse.

If there is a ’social recession’, it is limited to members of a small, troubled, self-perpetuating group, which is neither reflective of the communities they blight nor the fault of one political party. It is a problem which has existed for generations and will probably persist generations from now: the only thing left to argue about is whether it’s gotten better or worse, and whether it can be solved.

But despite being unrepresentative of either the poor or the wider working class, cases such as the Edlington attacks are often the only occasion for the media to take the time to report on poverty & deprivation. Prior to news of this attack, who can honestly say they had even heard of this small South Yorkshire town, let alone understood its character and problems? Prior to the kidnap of Shannon Matthews, who can honestly claim to have known where Dewsbury Moor was, or the demographics of the people living there? My own knowledge of Haringey is limited to the appalling crimes which happened there; I know nothing of the area or its people.

Because our view of these areas is restricted to its most infrequent but appalling crimes, we rarely take the time to examine the more generic, structural problems which exist. What’s the quality of the housing? How might the schools be improved? Do social workers have enough time to do justice to their clients? Where offending behaviour occurs, are there opportunities for community sentencing? Is there enough Early Intervention for parents who’re at risk? When your first introduction to a place makes you recoil in horror, these questions are rarely asked, and answers rarely sought.

The challenge, then, for people who campaign against poverty & inequality, is to humanise the problem; to demonstrate the struggles and champion the success stories which occur in these communities and – above all – give its residents a voice. Without that, we’ll just have to make do with a succession of bleak headlines which neither gives a true reflection of the communities in which they occurred, nor truly grapples with the causes.

One reason we think society is broken is because parts of it remain invisible. That’s something we can – and must – seek to change.

Personalised service and Knight’s digital vision

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

community Links Advice workerPersonalised service = zero human interaction. An online welfare system; modern, instant and resistant to human frustration or despair: the computer says no.  I just read today’s announcements by Jim Knight MP, the employment minister about improving the Jobcentre’s service. If you have a lack of computer skills you will get a technologies budget to get internet access at home and training in computer skills. He also went on to say that the Jobcentre Plus measures it success in the number of people get gets into a sustainable job.

Last week a group of local volunteers got together with local unemployed people from Canning Town as part of the Need NOT Greed campaigning groups. One guy had been unemployed since the 80’s and told us how he struggled to apply for jobs as the Jobcentre adverts often only provide emails, not phone numbers to call.

 Today I spoke to a local grassroots campaigner who needed £20 to pay his agreed debt payments or the bailiffs would be round tomorrow, eviction just in time for Christmas. He was looking for a cash-in-hand job to earn the emergency £20, and had one lined up but the rain meant it had been called off. The weather man tells us the rain isn’t likely to look any better over the coming months. Neither is his situation.

On Monday I heard a rumour that there would be an announcement from Jim Knight by the end of this week about improving the service and efficiency at the Jobcentre. Immediately some recent reports sprung to mind Working Alongside, produced with ATD and both  People of Influence and Time Well Spent from the Council on Social Action. I emailed Jim Knight’s private office about the announcement and included Working Alongside to contribute some recommendations from individuals who had experienced the service themselves. I got no response. Frustrated I picked up the phone to call, I was told the appropriate person would call back. In despair I read the announcements this morning.

Online activity is great; we use it regularly at Community Links as part of our Need NOT Greed campaign and Chain Reaction social network. It is great to share government and grassroots activists voices, to link people up and to support people. However accessing benefits online and applying for jobs online will not deal with the multiple complex problems that the most vulnerable face, like the two people I met just over the past week.

Bringing in a move like this is important, so that the 21% of  UK adults who have never used the internet are not even more excluded in 10 years time. However “personalised” online efficiency is not the same as “humanised” one-to-one support. Consider Dell, I have been requiring their services recently because of a laptop problem that I have no understanding of. Most of us have experienced something similar. When dealing with new, complex issues that we have no, or very limited experience of, the first thing people want is someone to speak with directly, in a language they understand and to have confidence in their competency. If I had to entirely fix my own computer, by myself online – honestly I probably wouldn’t do it. On the other hand I’d prefer to search for employment on line. The welfare system is catering for incredibly complex needs and, yes, government actions on digital inclusion are excellent, but it should not mean sacrificing the vital one-to-one support that is needed and gives results.