Community Links

Community Links blog

Benefit fraud crackdowns drive people further into poverty

By Will Horwitz

It’s dispiriting to see the Conservatives today follow Labour’s lead in proposing even harsher sanctions for people accused of benefit fraud. As we’ve pointed out before, there are several problems with this increasingly punitive approach.

Firstly, from our experience giving advice to over 12,000 people each year in Newham, we know that almost all those defrauding the system do so out of need, not greed. They need a few hours work to tide them over – to pay a surprise bill, or replace the microwave. Declaring it to the Jobcentre would mean any earnings are deducted from benefits, leaving them with no extra money. Punishing these people is unfair, but also destructive – they need stepping stones to a job and higher income, not sanctions which push them further into poverty. The occasional extreme case of greed you read about in the papers does not reflect the lives of those coming through our doors.

Secondly, benefit fraud is not as big a problem as either party might have you believe. Less than one percent of benefit claimants commit fraud (56,000 out of 5.8m), and more money is wasted each year on error (around £2bn) than is given to people claiming fraudulently. Meanwhile, about £1.2bn is underpaid, meaning people desperately in need of benefits do not receive them. Advertising campaigns that flame the public perception that everyone on benefits cheats the system are actively stigmatising and harmful.

Thirdly, while both parties would argue that sanctions act as a deterrent, they don’t seem to have considered the fate of those they sanction. These, by definition, are not people with wealth to fall back on. Denying people benefits, for 13 weeks or 3 years, is going to force them further into debt and eventually destitution. It’s hard to see how this is addressing the causes of poverty.

In short, politicians might be surprised to discover how much fraud would go down if they sorted out the benefits system so it worked better for the people it’s meant to serve. In the meantime, don’t drive people further into poverty by imposing heavy-handed sanctions on people who, in the main, are just trying to get together enough money to get by.

5 Responses to “Benefit fraud crackdowns drive people further into poverty”

  1. [...] There must be a worry that relying totally on profit making charities (social enterprises) will affect what type of care is delivered and how. I want to know what Will thinks about this, since he’s the one with a street-level view. [...]

  2. Will Horwitz says:

    Mark Easton published a very interesting piece on this. Apparently no-one has ever been convicted of benefit fraud three times, and only 69 people last year were convicted of it for the second time.

    Theresa May claims it will send a message to potential benefit cheats, but it doesn’t seem as though that message is necessary (and neither are the less severe but still harsh penalties included in the Welfare Reform Bill, which have not yet been introduced).

    Instead the message is aimed at the electorate. This cynical stigmatisation of people on benefits – by both parties – is deplorable. Not only that, it also actively hampers efforts to tackle poverty, as public support declines and people struggling to get off benefits, perhaps by doing a bit of work on the side, are driven underground.

  3. Do not forget that the kinds of borrowing offered to those on benefit budgets ask for some £15 interest on £50. What are you supposed to do – send the kids to school barefoot? That’ll look great for rebuilding our economy!

  4. Aaron Barbour says:

    The focus should be on benefit take-up not benefit fraud but that does “appeal” (in a perverse sense) to middle class voters. We should all be working to change these grossly misinformed and stereotypical perceptions of people in receipt of benefits (and tax credits).

    The Child Poverty Unit’s Take-Up Taskforce (which I was part of) made some very useful and do-able recommendations: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/strategy/parents/childpoverty/childpoverty/

  5. Jay says:

    I’ve quoted your second paragraph on a blog post I’ve written about the benefits fraud advertising campaign – I hope that’s ok?

    http://city-project.blogspot.com/2010/04/streets-speak-urban-political.html

Leave a Reply