Community Links

Community Links blog

Archive for April, 2010

New look, same blog

Friday, April 30th, 2010

A quick break from the usual incisive commentary and insight from our East London streets, with a quick post to point out our new look. LinksUK has always been a part of Community Links even though we looked different. We’re making it more obvious who we are by moving the blog into the Community Links website.

For those of you who aren’t aware of Community Links, we’re a community charity based in East London. Besides writing blogs, we work with 30,000 people each year, providing everything from advice services to the most successful back-to-work scheme in London, youth clubs, children’s activities, our own school for excluded pupils, and even run Newham City Farm. Do take a look around the website to find out more.

Apologies for any glitches in the blog, do let us know if you see any, and we can sort them out.

The Fairness Test – will leaders sign up to an equality impact assessment?

Monday, April 26th, 2010

Community Links has joined a group of other charities today in calling for the main party leaders to commit to a Fairness Test, to ensure the poorest in society do not shoulder the burden of reducing our national debt.

The test, which is supported by organisations including the Child Poverty Action Group, Barnardo’s, Save the Children, and the Equality Trust, would ensure that major tax or spending changes are rigorously assessed for their impact on inequality. Carried out by the Treasury, the Inequality Impact Assessment would mean that governments cannot make major changes without being aware of the consequences for inequality and the knock-on effects on the cohesiveness and wellbeing of the whole society.

At Community Links we are all to aware that even small cuts in seemingly-small budgets can have dramatic effects. For example, we provide welfare and benefits advice to over 12,000 people every year – a vital service that last year ensured they received an extra £1.3m they were entitled to. Cuts to services like these might go unnoticed next to much larger spending decisions, but would be devastating to the people we work with. An inequality impact assessment would help safeguard vital services like these.

More on Cameron’s Big Society

Monday, April 19th, 2010

We’ve been poring over an excellent piece by Madeleine Bunting in today’s Guardian, not least because it begins with a great description of our Rokeby Community Centre, which Madeleine visited last week.

When she came, we made four points, applicable to any party trying to promote community action, and worth repeating here.

Firstly, recognise that this kind of work is already going on, in places like the Rokeby Centre, and has been for a long time. Community Links has been here 30 years.

Secondly, harnessing mainstream budgets, like welfare or housing, to strengthen communities rather than undermine them, would be far more powerful than making small additional budgets available. One way to do this is to harness the potential for the relationship between those delivering public services and those receiving them.

Thirdly, this kind of action thrives on partnership, between state, business, and the third sector.

And fourthly, it must be properly funded. You need to build fences at the top of the cliff as well as running ambulances at the bottom, and although it’s much easier to withdraw funding from the fences, when budgets are tight it’s even more crucial you keep building them.

What do you think of the Big Society? We’d be interested to hear your views.

Will the era of televised debate transform politics in the UK?

Monday, April 19th, 2010

Arriving into work on Friday, Jackie and Jane, who are both local residents and members of staff at Community Links were discussing the first ever live election debate in the UK. They told me they have never really been interested in national politics before, or never felt engaged, but went on to explain how Thursday’s broadcast has changed this:

“I have never had any interest in politics before, but this time I am voting because this is something I heard, I understand and now am interested in. I have spoken to so many local people who have said the same thing.

(more…)

DWP’s mixed messages on benefits

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Following on from our earlier post on benefit fraud, it’s worth noting an interesting debate on the subject in the Lords last week. In 2009 James Purnell’s Welfare Reform Bill was passed and in it was the controversial ‘one strike and you’re out’ amendment; section 24 of the new Act. After the first caution or administrative penalty, let alone conviction, a claimant will have their benefits stopped for a four week period. If this happens twice (two strikes) in a five year period their benefits will be stopped for thirteen weeks.

(more…)

Benefit fraud crackdowns drive people further into poverty

Friday, April 9th, 2010

It’s dispiriting to see the Conservatives today follow Labour’s lead in proposing even harsher sanctions for people accused of benefit fraud. As we’ve pointed out before, there are several problems with this increasingly punitive approach.

Firstly, from our experience giving advice to over 12,000 people each year in Newham, we know that almost all those defrauding the system do so out of need, not greed. They need a few hours work to tide them over – to pay a surprise bill, or replace the microwave. Declaring it to the Jobcentre would mean any earnings are deducted from benefits, leaving them with no extra money. Punishing these people is unfair, but also destructive – they need stepping stones to a job and higher income, not sanctions which push them further into poverty. The occasional extreme case of greed you read about in the papers does not reflect the lives of those coming through our doors.

Secondly, benefit fraud is not as big a problem as either party might have you believe. Less than one percent of benefit claimants commit fraud (56,000 out of 5.8m), and more money is wasted each year on error (around £2bn) than is given to people claiming fraudulently. Meanwhile, about £1.2bn is underpaid, meaning people desperately in need of benefits do not receive them. Advertising campaigns that flame the public perception that everyone on benefits cheats the system are actively stigmatising and harmful.

Thirdly, while both parties would argue that sanctions act as a deterrent, they don’t seem to have considered the fate of those they sanction. These, by definition, are not people with wealth to fall back on. Denying people benefits, for 13 weeks or 3 years, is going to force them further into debt and eventually destitution. It’s hard to see how this is addressing the causes of poverty.

In short, politicians might be surprised to discover how much fraud would go down if they sorted out the benefits system so it worked better for the people it’s meant to serve. In the meantime, don’t drive people further into poverty by imposing heavy-handed sanctions on people who, in the main, are just trying to get together enough money to get by.

Benefit fraud crackdown will plunge more people into poverty, not tackle its causes

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Our press release reacting to today’s Conservative proposal. More thoughts later.

Most benefit fraud is committed out of need not greed, and harsher penalties will not work, says leading grassroots charity Community Links reacting to Conservative proposals to further penalise benefit fraud.

(more…)