Community Links

Community Links blog

Archive for February, 2010

Over to you – what are the most important issues around working age poverty?

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Did you know that of the seven million people deemed ‘economically inactive’ in the UK, two million would like to work? Or that last year 22% of women were in jobs earning less than £7 an hour? Or that many people moving off benefits into work end up no better off?

There are all sorts of reasons why people of working age end up living in poverty. Community Links and our partner Church Action on Poverty have won funding from the DWP for a project to uncover, raise awareness of, and begin to tackle, some of these issues. It’s part of the European Year Against Poverty.

At Community Links we’ve always believed that people who experience a problem understand it best, so we’re going to spend the next few months asking people experiencing poverty what needs to change. Once we’ve agreed on the most important issues, both perceptions that need challenging and policies that need changing, we’ll set about doing just that.

And we’d like to hear what you think.

(more…)

“Your plans are too ambitious for a lone parent”

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

On the day Gingerbread launch their Lose the Labels campaign, Zoe Hannam tells us about the reality of being a single parent. Zoe has set up Maisonentersurprises, supporting people to set up their own small businesses.

I am a white middle class woman in my forties with two children, I have been rebuilding my life after a divorce 4 years ago.

The three of us form a family unit. I do not label nor think of myself as a lone parent – I am an entrepreneur carving a career for myself in order to provide for mine and my children’s future, and hopefully create opportunities for other lone parents

I had never experienced discrimination before, but over the past 5 years making the transition from a self-sufficient traditional family unit to a ‘lone parent on benefits’ has presented me with many barriers and traps.  I have overcome these obstacles but my children and I suffer the consequences – from debt to lost homes.

I was once told that ‘my plans were too ambitious for a lone parent.’ My immediate response ‘why?!’

We are all unique and individual in our own right, yet we give up our identity and ambition to fit society’s definition of single parents. In my opinion this could have a major impact on our children, who miss out on opportunities because their mum was ‘only fit for certain jobs, as a lone parent.’

New campaign tackles stigma against single parents

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Kate Bell is Director of Policy at Gingerbread, whose Lose the Labels campaign launches today.

Community Links hosted a great debate here a few weeks back about the portrayal of people on low incomes in the media. With half of single parents living below the poverty line, they often end up on the sharp end of negative coverage. We think there’s an additional stigma though that goes with single parenthood – one that, although it’s changed, hasn’t gone away since Gingerbread launched back in 1918 as the National Council for the Unmarried Mother and her Child.

(more…)

Should Parliament move to east London?

Friday, February 12th, 2010

MPs have put forward a suggestion that Parliament should move its premises to east London’s ExCel centre. This is just a few minutes away from our base in Canning Town so we asked our staff what they thought, 80% of our staff live locally or are ex-service users.

Here’s what they said:

‘Not sure why ExCel would be considered a location more in touch with real life. It is in many ways more isolated than Westminster.’

‘I think that’s a great idea, especially as Newham, even though the host borough for the Olympics is still one of the poorest boroughs, and the politicians would get a better insight to the area and its problems.’

‘I would strongly disagree due to the strain on local roads, facilities etc. Also, with the constant threat of terrorism I do not like the idea of such high profile figures at the end of my road.’

‘I think it’s a great idea for Parliament to be located in the heart of East London, especially with a backdrop of the recent tarnished media image of Westminster politics & expenses scandals over the last year. The areas of regeneration immediately surrounding the ExCel Centre, such as Canning Town and Newham in general would provide a daily reminder, and accurate snapshot of the array of challenges facing people today. Westminster Palace can be seen to be a location that can often be seen to be its own detached and removed world. In addition there could be marked cost reduction benefits to the tax payer also, and potential to make such a site a sustainable one, perhaps helping to restore some faith in the public that politics and voting is a system one should try to engage with in order to help address society’s problems.’

‘My experience of the Excel centre is that it is a place full of ’suits’ on dubious expenses!!!!!!’

‘I really don’t want them in east London.  We already have enough agro when the biannual DSEI exhibition is held at the Excel.  Then we will have the massive inconvenience of “heightened security” from about April 2011 until the end of the games.  We have permanent armed cops in Royal Docks because of the airport!’

I personally think instead of the Excel centre perhaps some of them should move in with us to see how the real day to day to life is like, see what we have to put up with, I bet half of them would be scared to go out after 6pm. Most of them don’t know what real life is like, with all their pampering up at Whitehall.

There we go again, they want the accommodation in the Olympic village and to be in for 2012……..

“Once the Olympic athletes have left the Village how about turning it into dormitory accommodation for MPs right next to a new Parliament – that way nobody would need to apply for a second home allowance and the security and official transport could all be pooled making a financial saving.”

Apart from the obvious benefit, the creation of a local food outlet other that one long standing bakery to swarm to for lunch, we would have MPs at our doorstep. Would local east London people get more involved in governmental affairs as a result? Would the cynicism and lack of trust that has increased since the MP expenses scandal in the summer gradually disappear (that is why MPs are suggesting this surely?!), probably not.

The Canary Wharf development is a stones throw from Canning Town and has had very little impact on local residents in all the years that is has been there. When asked what impact Canary Wharf has had, our community development team replied that ‘most locals say it is for rich people, there is a stigma to it as it cost millions and it has no place for them, the shops are lovely but far too expensive so its just somewhere some feel them can go for a nice wander around’

If government is trying to find ways to reconnect with the public and be in touch with real life issues to win back that trust they have completely lost then it will take more than packing up and moving location. That is a mis-diagnosis of the problem. We have had political apathy for a long time; in the 2005 election there was an overall voting turnout of 61.4% in the UK, a slight rise in an overall declining trend from previous decades. Last summer’s revelations fed ammunition to turn that apathy to resentment. Parliament needs to changes its practices; get out, listen and take action, not relocate to what is considered less attractive dwellings and adopt exactly the same customs as before. The geography isn’t the problem; it’s the lack of listening to real people. Not just listening for the sake of an election but to take action and do something about it. That will win the hearts and minds of local people and make it worthwhile to plan a trip over to Westminster.

Welfare Commission: humanising decision making and appeals in the benefits system

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Today the Department for Work and Pensions Select Committee publishes its report on decision making and appeals in the benefits system, the headline press coverage reports that overpayments due to error had soared from £400 million in 2000, while overpayments due to fraud and mistakes by claimants dropped. As part of the solution the select Committee is calling for a Welfare Commission to be set up to simplify the benefits system. We welcome this news and believe that any redesign should place a one-to-one service to claimants at its heart; ensuring efficient and humanised service delivery. We have a few specific recommendations for the Commission to consider

  • Reduce the complexity of claim forms,
  • Make crisis loans more accessible and immediate,
  • Addresses the inconsistency of the earnings disregard across all benefits to ensure accidental fraud is not committed resulting in benefits being automatically stopped.

Last year the Community Links advice services were used by a total of 12,400 local people. At our drop-in advice sessions 37.8% were benefits related cases, of which 73% were a result of DWP error. Our advice services continue to be in high demand, services cost several hundred thousand pounds per year – funded by local authorities and the Legal Services Commission. This cost to the tax payer could be dramatically reduced by the simplification of the benefits system and increased competency with the administration process.

Research by AdviceUK in Nottingham reveals that 42% of the demand at advice agencies in the city is ‘failure demand’ – demand caused by failures in the system of public administration. Reducing this would save significant amounts of money and free up advisors to carry out valuable work with clients, supporting them to resolve their long-term problems.

Many of our clients have used our advice services in the past; some have had their benefits mistakenly stopped on more than one occasion. The knock-on effects are increased borrowing and debt, eviction problems and in many cases people falling into the informal economy, working cash-in-hand to cover costs as a last resort. Debt related advice has doubled, and our advisers believe this is in part due to the recession-related rise in claimant figures, and benefits being stopped or delayed as people struggle to find formal work.

Our campaign, Need NOT Greed has been calling for a simplified benefits system. A system which is easier to navigate could help prevent the rise of informal economic activity caused by people struggling to survive poverty. At the launch of the Need NOT Greed campaign in February 2009 Terry Rooney, chair of the DWP select committee said

“There is a treadmill of being in the informal economy out of Need NOT Greed. The striking thing is that the national benefits system is geared up to serve millions, but everybody is an individual – it’s how you can recognise everyone’s needs and requirements. You need a totalitarian system and there are enormous challenges – but ones that need to be faced and met.”

A local campaigner and user of our advice services said

“the system wears you down, I am constantly just surviving. Every time you pick yourself up and try to move forward the system lets you down again. It’s the same old problems for everyone and none of us round here trust it anymore. How can something you don’t trust be able to help you?”

Rising unemployment is increasing demand for welfare benefits at a time when public funding is under severe pressure. Spending time building productive relationships with people using services is time well spent; not an extravagance. These relationships are instrumental to efficient delivery of public services. We hope that a Welfare Commission is established as it is evident that change is necessary – but change must put the needs of the service user at the heart of the system.

£16bn of benefits go unclaimed every year

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Community links is one of the 27 charities challenging government today over the £16bn in benefits that go unclaimed every year. The campaign, coordinated by Citizens Advice, wants government to set targets to improve the take-up of means-tested benefits, ensuring that money earmarked for some of the most vulnerable people actually reaches them.

It’s an issue we’ve been aware of for some time. About 12,000 people visit Community Links’ advice service every year for support with benefits, housing and debt. Last year we helped them claim over £1.3m in benefits they were entitled to but not receiving.

Last year’s Benefit Take-up Task Force, which we sat on, looked at the issue and some progress was made as a result. Targets for housing benefit take up have now been included in the Audit Commission’s Key Lines of Enquiry (KLOE) for local authorities, and there is support from the Treasury to push this.

However the difficulty lies in the fact that, as always government departments do not work together very well. As different departments issue different benefits – HMRC for Working Tax Credits, DWP for out of work benefits, local authorities for housing benefit – it makes it very difficult to create and impose targets for benefit take up as a whole. There is a concern that targets will deter agencies, acting as a barrier to encouraging them to do more. This complexity is also one reason why people don’t access them in the first place.

Nevertheless it is clear something must be done. Citizens Advice highlight that four out of five low paid workers without children (1.2bn households) miss out on tax credits worth at least £38 per week, a total of £1.9 billion, and as many as half of working households entitled to housing benefit do not claim it. There’s a similar story with council tax benefit, pension credit, and child tax credit.

Access to these extra benefits could take households above the point of desperate struggle, into a situation where they’re able to look forward and plan for the future. There are many reasons why people don’t claim everything they’re entitled to – we frequently meet people who just don’t know about them, people who think they could get them but are left baffled by the complexity of the system, and those who want to but don’t know how.

Targets will ensure that local authorities, job centres, and other offices make active efforts to ensure people access all their benefits – better advertising, more support, more accessible information. Therefore we fully support Citizens Advice on this benefits take-up campaign.

The Tower Block of Commons and the “Internal Orient”

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Last week we debated the portrayal of poverty in the media and touched on the poverty game show format – last night Channel 4 screened the first in the series the Tower Block of Commons following Members of Parliament as they spend a week living with families in Tower Block Estates across the UK.

The aim of the exercise was unclear. Was it to present to policymakers the everyday reality of their voters struggling through recession? To demonstrate how difficult it is to get by without a second-home allowance and a charge account at John Lewis? Or was the aim to portray the people living in social housing as workshy layabouts?

Just as the focus was unclear at the outset so was the documentary makers’ approach. At times hard-hitting exchanges, for example about drug misuse, provided a genuine insight to life on the estates. Yet the game show format meant challenging moments were  interspersed with exchanges which ridiculed stereotypes – the MP’s were each provided clothing by their hosts to make them fit-in resulting in a comedy costume competition.

Building one-to-one, personal contact enabled a couple of MPs to express real concern about improving the circumstances of their hosts.  However what did the MP’s think would happen to the damp, mouldy bathroom after “their” resident had been re-housed? It would simply be occupied by the next on the waiting list – without changing the underlying conditions.

Whilst warm relationships were established with individuals each of the MPs, to different extents, demonstrated their distance from the lives of some of the UKs neglected communities. The audience watching on TV were invited to participate in the “Us”  side of an “Us and Them” equation, gazing at the residents of the Tower Block as if they were aliens.

We have written before about the process of  “othering” and referred to Ruth Lister’s definition

‘Othering’: people in poverty are thought about, talked about and treated as ‘Other’ and inferior to the rest of society. A dividing line is drawn between ‘us’ and ‘them’ and the dividing line is imbued with negative judgements that construct ‘the poor’ variously as a source of moral contamination, a threat, an undeserving economic burden, failures in the meritocratic race, an object of pity or even as an exotic species to be studied.

There is a long history of people living in poverty being viewed as “other” dating back to melodramatic Victorians exploring the “Internal Orient” of London’s East End this TV programme reverts to simplistic stereotyping of people in poverty and, in reality, adds nothing to our understanding.

My experience at the Jobcentre

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Simon Gibson works part time as a community worker, volunteers with Community Links, and is taking a Community Development course. This is his experience at the Jobcentre

This is my first blog about my experience of being unemployed. I was made redundant after 20 years of working. I had never really taken much time before to find a job and usually just took whatever I could find.

This time I was unemployed I had reached a stage in my life (aged 41) where I wanted to make sure I just didn’t do anything but something I really wanted to do.

Luckily I was offered a job, 16 hour part-time work in something I really wanted. However, the information I got from the Job centre was that I was not entitled to any benefits unless I was actively looking for full time employment. I have since discovered this is not true.

It seems that the Job Centre is obsessed in getting people into work even though it might not be the work they want to do. There was no real understanding of my situation and I was not really treated as a person who needed to be worked with and understood. It was all about looking for work regardless of whether you are ready or know what is right for you.