Community Links

Community Links blog

Archive for March, 2009

Waiting for Change: Restaurant workers in the informal ecomomy

Monday, March 16th, 2009

this is brick lane

East London charity Toynbee Hall’s Transact team recently co-launched with us, a new report called ‘Waiting for Change’ which examines restaurant workers and the informal economy in Brick Lane’s curry mile.

The research reveals a picture of staff in east London’s Brick Lane restaurants trapped in poverty with long working hours for cash in hand pay as low as £3 an hour. Poor English and a lack of access to education is making it difficult for them to move on to better paid formal employment.

Over three-quarters of the Brick Lane restaurant workers we interviewed in October and November 2008 were paid significantly below the minimum wage, and nearly all were paid in cash. Most had no contract, paid no tax and worked between 50 and 65 hours a week – a six day working week was the norm.

“I work split shifts – six days a week – about ten hours a day and I get £210 a week in cash,”
Waiter B.

The majority of interviewees wanted to move on to better-paid work but a gruelling split shift working pattern made it virtually impossible for them to gain the English language and other skills they needed. Almost three quarters said poor English prevented them achieving their aspirations, whilst just over half blamed a lack of education and qualifications.

“People work here because we don’t know English – there is no social life,”
Waiter Q.

We discussed the findings and recommendations on 27th February with local community groups, Tower Hamlets Council, Learning and Skills Council, East London Business Place , Bangladesh-British Chamber of Commerce, Trade Unions, and the national Bangladesh Caterers Association. Unfortunately the Bangla Town Restaurant Association didn’t turn up, maybe reflecting the challenges that could be faced in working with the restaurant owners to formalise their business practices.

The positive discussion focussed primarily on the recommendations from the report and a practical way forward, including establishing a partnership group of Bangladeshi community and business organisations and the voluntary and public sector agencies to advise on interventions and further research; developing the skills of restaurant workers (people seemed keen on developing a curry academy); developing English language skills, delivered at times and places convenient to staff; and conducting an audit of the informal economy in Tower Hamlets. We all agreed that the informal economy will be wide spread across a variety of business sectors.

The Community Links informal economy consultancy service could help provide the baseline data and turn the findings into strategy and practical action.

We look forward to working with Toynbee Hall over the coming months including at the Banglatown Mela in Brick Lane on 10th May when, as a next step, we will be distributing thousands of leaflets to inform local workers of their employment rights and where to seek support.

Dowload the full report and, if you live or work around Brick Lane  or in Tower Hamlets and you want to get involved, contact Jamie Elliot (  Jamie.Elliott@toynbeehall.org.uk ) at Transact.

Tackling Worklessness in a recession

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

Roadsign men at workI attended a conference last week for the launch of the Tackling Worklessness Report: a review of the contribution and role of the local authorities and partnerships lead by Councillor Stephen Houghton.

There was an impressive range of speakers from different government departments at both a local and a national level. This report and the event itself showed how essential it is to have a joined up government strategy to tackle worklessness effectively.

Joined up government may be an overused phrase nowadays but it still proves incredibly difficult to achieve in reality.

The review proposes a Challenge Fund to change regeneration and worklessness strategies in deprived communities where there are no jobs. There was talk of local knowledge and different indicators for success; based on measuring progression as well as employment. The review called for the requirement of a national, regional and local framework with the Working Neighbourhoods Fund to have a work and skills plan in place and innovation being central to create new jobs.

There was common consensus that local targets should be about employability as well as employment and the entrepreneurial spirit in communities should be harnessed to create jobs and social enterprises. 

Great! Even the DWP want to keep the balance between employment targets and preventing people becoming trapped on welfare benefits. But, joined up government poses two problems for the DWP – devolution requires a leap of faith which may not stand up to the scrutinising powers of the DWP select committee and local government may not be able to provide concrete action to get people closer to the labour market, basically national government are saying there is a sense of urgency and they don’t have time to mess about.

However in 2009 with the current economic climate; localism is important, innovation is important, entrepreneurialism is important, and really understanding the communities where worklessness was a big problem before the recession is key. If government is to build a better future for individuals and communities deepest in poverty then it must work at a local level to understand what exactly is going on in their community and how people can build their own ladders out of poverty.

The following day I attended an event by two Need NOT Greed coalition members, Oxfam and Community Pride to raise awareness of the informal economic activity of a community considered highly inactive and deprived. It was a great step forward to be working with a local council and potentially work together to harness this activity to create formal employment and transform lives and whole communities. When tackling worklessness local, and national government must understand that the informal economy is the bedrock to deprived communities- it should be the basis to joined up government initiatives,

“The informal economy is essential. Communities like this would fall apart without this informal economy structure – it’s a massive economy in itself. It provides a structure which the community could not function without, because of its flexibility and the lack of choices and opportunities people face”  

Quote extracted from Invisible Workers: The informal Economy Report by Oxfam and Community Pride

Need NOT Greed campaign mentioned in Parliament yesterday

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

Dai Davies MP at launch of Need NOT Greed Campaign along with Secretary of State DWP James Purnell (photo Eva Savojic www.evasajovic.co.uk )

Following the successul launch of our Need NOT Greed campaign on 24th Februrary in the House of Commons, it was great to see that Dai Davies MP referred to the launch in yesterday’s debate in the House on Unemployment. You can read the full debate from Hansard (the record of Parliamentary proceedings) via They Work For You website.  

Mr Davies said “People need support before they get there (to Jobcentre Plus), but often those support mechanisms are not in place. Jobcentres need to work more closely with other organisations and signpost people much better. A week ago, the Secretary of State (Rt. Hon James Purnell ) and I were at a presentation by a campaign group called ‘Need Not Greed’. We listened to some of the experiences of people who were struggling through the benefits system and the unemployment system, trying to find work. Jobcentre Plus does all it can, but huge numbers of people are falling through the net. Individuals are often not informed of the welfare rights that are available to them. Again, there is a failure to join up what is out there in the marketplace.”  

It’s great to see our local experience, knowledge and recommendations being taken on and actively used by politicans and policymakers in Westminster. If you’d like to find out more about our Need NOT Greed campaign then visit our dedicated website: www.neednotgreed.org.uk   And download a free copy of our latest Social Change booklet on the Informal Economy.

When the Powerful met the Poor

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

P1000141

It can be fun, if a little unfair, to think of the folks down at Westminster, a bastion of British power and status, in silly, stereotypical ways. Tall, older men in suits, possibly a little round in the middle, perhaps sporting a top-hat or even (my favourites) a cane and monocle, striding hurriedly from one high-powered meeting to the next.

Clearly, such a description does real MPs a disservice. Still, you wouldn’t really expect Westminster to welcome people who see the government as distant and threatening; people who are technically in breach of law and actively hunted by the authorities.

 But that is what happened on the 24th February, when the Need NOT Greed campaign was launched in Westminster. A panel of around nine people openly discussed their experiences of working cash-in-hand, explaining the ways in which they are forced to do so out of need rather than greed, in front of an audience of MPs, peers and others. It was a courageous thing to do and that courage was rewarded with some real and generous engagement from the audience.

One member of the audience drew attention to the situation of many illegal immigrants who have worked informally in Britain for over twenty years and live on a knife-edge, fearing the consequences of injury or sickness. Panel and audience members discussed the criminalisation of those working cash-in-hand and the disruption of communities it leads to. The idea of an amnesty for those working informally was raised more than once, again from panel and audience.

Nearly all the panel members related experiences of the complexity and lack of co-ordination on the benefits system. Members of the audience told similar stories, such as that of a man who, upon starting a job, was told he could keep both of his benefits. This turned out to be false information, eventually leading to debt and a nervous breakdown. The ’starvation amount’ of Jobseeker’s Allowance, £60.50 a week for over 25s, was criticised by the panel and audience alike. These stories from the panel and audience showed that stressful and difficult experiences of the benefits system really are widespread.

The positive tone of the discussion was also shown by various audience members really listening to people’s criticisms of the system and acknowledging the difficulties that people have had with it. In response to the many stories of the system’s complexity, some audience members pointed out that the system is so huge and complex that even though a simple and flexible system is a very attractive ideal, it is a horribly difficult to realise. Indeed, it was suggested that simplicity and flexibility are at odds with each other.

What could have been a traditional stand-off between those in power and those who feel distant from and threatened by those in power, was actually a positive exchange. No tempers flared; no-one interrupted others. This good relationship between the panel and audience maybe reflects the fact that for many people, not just the poorest, the benefits system is very complex, difficult and (if you’ll allow me) taxing.

Whilst it is all too easy to be cynical about politics and politicians to the point of surrender, the good rapport and respect shown at the launch between politicians and people working informally is not an end in itself. The Need NOT Greed campaign has only started and must rumble on steadily and noisily. Support the campaign by visiting the campaign website at www.neednotgreed.org.uk/ and getting involved.

Voices for change: Welfare and poverty

Monday, March 9th, 2009

The only thing green about the Prince of Darkness...

Actions speak louder than words’ – but, according to Mark Twain, ‘not nearly as often’

The green custard attack on Peter Mandelson sparked numerous debates over the weekend as friends and families debated the rights and wrongs of the action over a drink in the pub or a Sunday breakfast. No matter who I spoke to, or what paper I read everybody had a view, they all had something to say about it, it was great to engage in so many conversations.

However the key words in the above are ‘rights and wrongs of the action’. The discussions were about Peter Mandleson and security issues, the British political history of protesting and even the ins and outs of how the custard was turned green. There was debate around the climate change issue itself, but in this case there is a feeling that actions may be louder than the words behind it.

Some people are asking how effective this action was in changing government policy. Maybe it will be and maybe it won’t, but it certainly got people talking. My question is – are they talking about the climate change issue or the act of throwing custard over a decision maker? As we got taking the custard throwing activity brought back memories of John Prescott’s experience with the eggs, but very few of the people I asked could remember why it happened in the first place, what was the cause behind it.

So do actions speak louder than words? Today I received two pieces of information; the first was an invite to Faith in Community’s Scotland’s first Poverty Truth Commission: an incredibly important conversation bringing people together who have the experience of poverty and those who have the power to make changes.

The second was news that thirty protesters from the London Coalition Against Poverty, LCAP have just occupied DWP offices in central London to protest against the new welfare reform bill. 

We launched our Need NOT Greed campaign recently at Westminster, bringing together the decision makers and people working, cash-in-hand out of need, as a survival strategy. The campaign has begun the way we intend it to continue; by having a strong working relationship with government and decision makers and people who understand the problems and changes needed the best. Those who bravely spoke about their experiences with poverty and the informal economy came out feeling positive and empowered.

At Community Links we believe that people who experience a problem understand it best. Voices and actions will create change only if they are listened to. Creating a space for dialogue is a step in itself to tackling poverty and creating change. Maybe the Welfare Reform protest will encourage the DWP to take action and get out of the office and speak to more people on the ground; otherwise, as we have seen, people will come in and speak to them.

Do actions speak louder than words, or is speaking out about poverty an action itself? What is important is exactly what is being said and who is doing the listening.

To get involved visit www.neednotgreed.org.uk

Social Change Series 3: Informal Economy

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

Social Change Series Cover image: Informal EconomyThe Community Links Social Change Series has been extended with the launch at the House of Commons last week of the third in the series focussing on our research into the Informal Economy and its impact on poverty and community regeneration. 

The publication of this new booklet coincided with the launched of our “Need NOT Greed” campaign. You can see more from the launch online including video and photography.

Our Social Change Series draws together information from our existing research reports detailing our position and track record on significant, complex issues which we, as a multipurpose organisation, are engaged with on several levels. The booklets provide an overview and links to the original research we have conducted.

Social Change Booklets Cover imagesThe first two Social Change booklets on Regeneration and Child Poverty are also available for free download – or send me an e-mail and I’ll drop a copy in the post.