Community Links

Community Links blog

Archive for July, 2008

NAO report on DWP ‘Handling Customer Complaints’

Tuesday, July 29th, 2008

Cover Image: NAO report
In December 2007 we helped National Audit Office staff to define the scope of what was to be their next project, examining how the governments Department for Work and Pensions handles customer complaints. They have recently published their final report.

There are two points worth highlighting:

  • Only 1 in 5 complaints are being recorded (280,000 complaints are not recorded)

 

  • Half of those customers who do complain remain dissatisfied

 

Are DWP adequately changing their services as a result of their customer complaints? Or does it mean, as the report points out, that they are “missing early warnings of poor services, systematic errors of problems with its process”. [see our earlier post] Complaints, feedback and criticism are so valuable for any organisation, as they help us to learn, do better, and ultimately to provide what local people really want.

The Department for Communities and local Government (CLG) recently published a white paper on Empowerment “Communities in Control” (which we at Community Links contributed to and were quoted at the start of chapter 2)  The report contains an apt quote from Terry Leahy, Chief Executive of Tesco: “follow the customer, if they change… we change”.

Our Everyday Innovators approach takes the good ideas for improving local services from service users, frontline staff and managers  and puts them into practice. The change can be dramatic as this article demontrates. It outlinines our Everyday Innovators ‘form filling and interpreting service’ which we successfully ran for four years in our local Jobcentres.

UK Catalyst Awards – and why technology is boring…

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

catalyst logoThe Catalyst Awards for Social Technology were presented by PM Gordon Brown this morning. It was an enormously impressive  celebration of ingenuity and creative passion of organisations and individuals who have put “new technology” to use in tackling a range of tricky social issues. All award winners and shortlisted projects are detailed on the Catalyst website - and across the range of entries there is much to be be inspired by…

However during the event I was reminded  of a recent blog post. Anna Maybank reminds us that “technology is boring”.  Anna was quoting Clay Shirky who suggests in his book “Here Comes Everybody”  now that the web and mobile telephony are so embedded into everyday life, ”new technology” tools are commonplace, boring. 

People working together, connecting and collaborating, committed to tackle issues that affect us all  – using these technologies is the really exciting stuff. Potentially transformative.

There seems to be a growing critical mass of  people and organisations commited to sharing the ideas of socially useful technology. Alongside the UK Catalyst Awards,  2gether, Shine and Social Innovation Camp are recent examples. A whole raft of internet tools and infrastructure from Linux to Wikipedia and the blogosphere are supported by the willing commitment of skilled, enthusiastic amatuers who volunteer their time and expertise.

This morning’s award winners reveal that exciting connections between different people is where the sparks of innovation are generated.  People skilled at web design are collaborating with groups who need a public presence, community organisations with the reach of a small neighbourhood are being assisted to connect across the globe.  

Its an exciting time - Community Links was involved in developing the ideas for the UK Catalyst Awards,  the next stage is to take some of these ideas forward at our Chain Reaction event in November to Connect diverse people and projects to Collaborate on new ideas and to Commit to making a difference together. As the Prime Minister said today:

In the year ahead    we will see bold new international collaborations to promote social action - such as the first Chain Reaction forum on social leadership, taking place in London in November.

If you want to be part of it visit www.chain-reaction.org

DWP Welfare Reform – who benefits?

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008

Cover Image: No One Written Off report. DWP July 2008Yesterday the Secretary for Work and Pensions, James Purnell, introduced the Green Paper on Welfare Reform “No One Written Off”. The contents were previewed at the DWP’s Annual Conference and highlighted what people can do rather than what they cannot do. Ministers talked about enabling the individual and an emphasis on employment was central.

“The Green Paper focuses on the ‘three C’s; capability, contribution and control. It has a focus on the individual, on their ability to work, their contribution to the world of work and the personal responsibility they have for their own lives.”

“Work is good for people’s health, it has a transforming effect on both their skills and self esteem” according to Stephen Timms MP.

A message echoed both at the annual conference and at a seminar held yesterday on an internal review on Housing Benefit. Generally there was a very positive energy about Welfare Reform on both occasions.

Numerous interpretations of the Green Paper have been reported causing confusion and anger over its implications. The Times headlined their story ‘Work-for-dole will force the benefit cheats to start earning their keep’,  whilst other online media focus on the move away from outdated benefits Welfare shakeup to scrap incapacity benefit. In The Independent  Johann Hari describes how the safely net of benefits should infact be a trampoline. Based on the personal experience of a friend he describes how the current benefits system ‘keeps people in a rut’ and this ‘inactivity is infectious, you become convinced you can’t do anything’

Whatever way you interpret it, the Green Paper is themed around deterrence. James Purnell justified the tough sanctions as a way to deter people from work in the informal economy by filling their time up with community jobs they will have no opportunity to work on the side. The new Welfare System seems to be targeting people who work to earn a little bit of money as a way to lift themselves out of poverty.

(more…)

On the Fiddle- The riddle of Fraud.

Friday, July 11th, 2008

DWP HQ in London“Some risk-taking good for young” according to leading entrepreneur, Simon Woodroffe in today’s Metro. He highlights the necessity of ‘a go for it’ attitude in a cotton wool culture that discourages children from being innovative and taking measured risks.

Entrepreneurship is a highly regarded skill in today’s society, Sir Alan Sugar has achieved celebrity status as thousands across the UK idolise his success as a self-made man.

Yet in the same paper, a response to yesterday’s article about benefit cheat Dawn Shackleton echoed the TV programme On the Fiddle, shown last night on BBC 1. Clearly public sentiment is intolerant when readers state that it made their “blood boil to see confessed benefit fraudsters smiling”. It is clear that public sentiment associates benefit fraud with greed and immoral behaviour.

(more…)

G8: whose job to build a better world?

Thursday, July 10th, 2008

G8 world leaders plus EU president July 2008So, the leaders of  the G8 have issued their (heavily negotiated) final communiqué  with governments of each country signed-up to agreed positions on climate change, the global economy and tackling international political corruption  – generally setting about the job of building a better world.

But is it their job? …theirs alone?

Previous G8 meetings, notably Genoa, have seen demonstrations on the streets outside the conference centre, co-ordinated by pressure groups, NGO’s, political parties and concerned individuals. When the UK held the presidency in 2005 protestors formed a symbolic white band around Gleneagles in a manifestation of the “Make Poverty History” campaign. But who decides which demands get voiced from “civil society”?

And where does this leave the commercial organisations – the businesses and industries whose manufacturing processes and transportation is causing much of the carbon emissions that concern us all?

So whose job is it to build a better world? Who are the social leaders? … is it government, business, individuals – or all of the above

To examine some of these tricky questions the inaugural Chain Reaction event in November will bring together community activists, policy makers business leaders and young people from across the world in an event which combines the seriousness of Davos (the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum) with the eclectic and magical sharing of ideas that is Hay (the UK’s largest literary festival). Last week we launched the Chain Reaction website, which will connect people together virtually, celebrating examples of social leadership, and inspiring others to take action. And you can take action too – the first simple step is to engage in the debate. Take our sixty second survey online and talk about it in the website forums.

Go on … get involved!

Benefit Fraud

Wednesday, July 9th, 2008

No Ifs, No Buts posterFollowing the release of a report by the Public Accounts Committee  into the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) work on benefit fraud, senior MP Edward Leigh  has spoken out against the unacceptable reality that over £2 billion a year is lost due to error.

“The estimated amount of benefit lost each year to error by customers and officials has nearly doubled over five years to almost £2bn a year, this is not acceptable.”

 And yet he quickly deviates to the unacceptable existence of benefit fraud;

“Benefit fraud diverts public funds into the pockets of criminals and, in so doing, reduces our confidence in the benefits system.”

Our previous blog entry on the 20th May highlighted the necessity to read between the lines when interpreting these statistics and it appears that this has been taken on board.

The Conservatives have acknowledged that the system is too complex and the Liberal Democrats Work and Pensions Spokesman, David Laws MP, saw a solution in government sharing information and simplifying benefit claimant forms like in Canada and New Zealand. 

Articles in this week’s paper (The Metro) reported that the reduction in fraud from £2 billion to £800 million was due to a decision to reclassify overpayments of Disability Living Allowance as non-fraudulent. Yet the same article was given a title targeted at fraud and cheats.

(more…)

Benefits and tax credits – problems and solutions

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Interact Report cover In mid-June Joseph Rowntree Foundation  published ‘Problems in the delivery of benefits, tax credits and employment services’, This work references and complements our own report ‘Interact: benefits, tax credits and moving into work’, which we produced with Child Poverty Action Group and the Low Income Tax Reform Group. The report examined the complexity of peoples lives as they move in and out of work, and their interactions with the complex benefits, tax credit and tax systems.

 Both reports are well worth a read.

Think Research

Monday, July 7th, 2008

Think Research Report cover
Nice to see that the Social Exclusion Taskforce, part of the Cabinet Office, recently published ‘Think Research: Using research evidence to inform service development for vulnerable groups’. We were involved in commenting on earlier drafts. I’m quite pleased with the final version, as it’s a useful resource, though it could have done with a bit more about participatory research approaches.

Download a copy here 

We’re starting a Chain Reaction

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

2geher08 logo

Yesterday I went to the 2gether Festival to talk about in public for the first time a new Community Links initiative called Chain Reaction.  Chain Reaction is about connecting people together from around the world – both virtually and in real life – to work together on new ideas for social change. 

The website www.chain-reaction.org went live yesterday.  And then on 17-18 November this year we’re holding the first Chain Reaction event on London’s South Bank. 

Both the website and the event are designed to bring together people from different worlds – community activists, policy makers, businesses leaders, geeks, young people, and anyone with an interest in building a better world.  We believe that none of us on our own can change the world, not governments, not business, not communities.  We succeed when we work together.  And by the end of this year we aim to have at least 25 new practical ideas for social change which people have committed to taking forward together.

We began working on this idea about a year ago.  Chain Reaction is now part of the programme of the Prime Minister’s Council on Social Action, and with the backing of four government departments and the support of many companies and partner organisations we can now make this a reality.  Although it’s an ambitious project, it builds on principles embedded all Community Links’ work – local and national – in particular that those who experience a problem understand it best and that everyone has the potential to do great things.  

Chain Reaction is about one talent, experience or idea unlocking another, creating massive energy in a chain.  Our individual actions multiplied by millions of others are a driving force for change.  If our individual actions are reflected by those of organisations and businesses, and supported by governments, then, together, we have the power to change the world – literally creating a chain reaction.  

Will you join us?  Here’s an easy first step – visit the website, or complete our sixty second survey online.

At last a ‘Minimum Income Standard for Britain’

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008

Minimum Income Standard LogoI went along to the original launch announcing this research nearly two years ago, so it’s great to see the final report from Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the Centre for Research in Social Policy at Loughborough University and the Family Budget Unit at York University.
Download the findings here 

I’ve been really keen on this invaluable project because we now have a minimum baseline or benchmark to inform all future poverty debates and government policy making, including, for example, the setting of benefit payment rates.

The report defines a minimum income standard: “A minimum standard of living in Britain today includes, but is more than just, food, clothes and shelter. It is about having what you need in order to have the opportunities and choices necessary to participate in society.”

The findings have confirmed what we at Community Links have known for years that the current benefit system does not provide a sufficient income for people to live. In fact it pays people to stay in poverty. If a single working-age adult needs a budget of £158 per week before tax and housing costs. Then why does a single person on Jobseekers Allowance only get £60.50 a week? And why does a single adult, working full time, need to earn £6.88 an hour to reach this weekly standard, and yet the minimum wage is only £5.52 an hour? I would like to know what evidence are DWP and the Treasury using to set their rates.

Check out: www.minimumincomestandard.org