Community Links

Community Links blog

Archive for the ‘Attitudes’ Category

The Big Society in poor communities

Monday, June 7th, 2010

A year or so ago I was travelling around the country interviewing people to feature in an Oxfam report looking at the vital and overlooked contributions people on low incomes make to society (I was so impressed by one of my visits, to Community Links, that I soon applied for a job here).

It has finally made its way to publication, and is well worth a read. As I’ve said in a blog post for Oxfam, it takes on the myth that low income equals low contribution, that benefit claimant equals scrounger. It shows that the Big Society is flourishing in some of the poorest communities, something we know to our advantage at Community Links. In the last three years we have benefited from 82,000 hours of volunteering, most of it from local residents.

More on Cameron’s Big Society

Monday, April 19th, 2010

We’ve been poring over an excellent piece by Madeleine Bunting in today’s Guardian, not least because it begins with a great description of our Rokeby Community Centre, which Madeleine visited last week.

When she came, we made four points, applicable to any party trying to promote community action, and worth repeating here.

Firstly, recognise that this kind of work is already going on, in places like the Rokeby Centre, and has been for a long time. Community Links has been here 30 years.

Secondly, harnessing mainstream budgets, like welfare or housing, to strengthen communities rather than undermine them, would be far more powerful than making small additional budgets available. One way to do this is to harness the potential for the relationship between those delivering public services and those receiving them.

Thirdly, this kind of action thrives on partnership, between state, business, and the third sector.

And fourthly, it must be properly funded. You need to build fences at the top of the cliff as well as running ambulances at the bottom, and although it’s much easier to withdraw funding from the fences, when budgets are tight it’s even more crucial you keep building them.

What do you think of the Big Society? We’d be interested to hear your views.

Will the era of televised debate transform politics in the UK?

Monday, April 19th, 2010

Arriving into work on Friday, Jackie and Jane, who are both local residents and members of staff at Community Links were discussing the first ever live election debate in the UK. They told me they have never really been interested in national politics before, or never felt engaged, but went on to explain how Thursday’s broadcast has changed this:

“I have never had any interest in politics before, but this time I am voting because this is something I heard, I understand and now am interested in. I have spoken to so many local people who have said the same thing.

(more…)

Benefit fraud crackdown will plunge more people into poverty, not tackle its causes

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Our press release reacting to today’s Conservative proposal. More thoughts later.

Most benefit fraud is committed out of need not greed, and harsher penalties will not work, says leading grassroots charity Community Links reacting to Conservative proposals to further penalise benefit fraud.

(more…)

How to tackle poverty – ideas so far…

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Tackling poverty and unemployment are going to be dominant themes of the upcoming election. This week we’ve asked a group of experts – not just academics and policy staff but also people experiencing these issues for themselves – what change would make the most difference in reducing poverty amongst adults.

The 12 million people living in poverty in the UK are split roughly half and half between those in working households, and those in households where no one works.

(more…)

People think being a single parent is easy. It isn’t.

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Zoe Hannam tells us about the reality of being a single parent. Zoe has set up Maisonentersurprises, supporting people to set up their own small businesses.

I hear this kind of statement time and time again. “I have a partner, but I am like a single parent really – he doesn’t do any of the work. But I don’t get every other weekend off, and I am not entitled to benefits.”

But what these people do not acknowledge is that two parent families are supported emotionally and financially by each other.  Therefore do not have the same issues and stresses to deal with that goes hand in hand with single parenting.

(more…)

Challenging the perception that poverty doesn’t exist in the UK

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Nigel Moores and Ian Mather are from Rhyl in North Wales. They will be posting throughout the week. Nigel works for the West Rhyl Community Company, and is one of the founder members of West Rhyl First. Ian is Chair of Anti-Poverty Network Cymru.

Having spent many years working in West Rhyl, the most deprived ward in Wales, I have come across poverty on a daily basis. From people sleeping on the streets to children begging for food. This is reality on a daily basis for a large number of people both young and old.

However, the general perception is that poverty does not exist in the UK. Poverty is in third world countries. Starving children in Africa, people living on rubbish tips in India and child labour in China. Perceptions we see in the media on a daily basis. The media do not show the people living in poverty in the UK. It wouldn’t look good, not on our own doorstep, best left hidden away. Is it not far better to read about celebrities and millionaire footballers.

(more…)

Poverty is not just about unemployment

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Kate Bell is Director of Policy and Communications at Gingerbread

Gingerbread is the national charity working with single parents. Our new Lets Lose the Labels campaign seeks to challenge the myths and stereotypes that surround single parenthood. Over the past couple of weeks we’ve witnessed a spate of news stories that have shown just why this campaign is needed. We’ve seen single parents referred to as ‘welfare amazons’, reference to an ‘epidemic’ of single mothers, and to ‘growing numbers of mothers…choosing to live alone and relying on state benefits which encourage them “not to bother” settling with a life partner’.

(more…)

Tanya’s story: (Not) getting into work in Stockton-on-Tees

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Church Action on Poverty runs a project called Thrive in Stockton-on-Tees. Thrive carries out action research into the factors that keep people in poverty, and does community organising work to help people in poverty make a difference.

Tanya, a lone parent with childcare qualifications, is one of the people who’s been involved in Thrive’s work over the last year. Her story illustrates very clearly some of the challenges that face people who are out of work but looking for a job. CAP’s Liam Purcell chatted with Tanya by phone, and she was eager to tell people about her experiences.

Tanya used to be self-employed as a child-minder, but found that the work simply didn’t pay. For minding five children – including several with learning difficulties – and dealing with difficult parents, she got just £3.25 an hour. She could only earn £33 a week and had to top up her earnings with Income Support. She found it hugely frustrating.

(more…)

Rich, famous, jobless, and not as bad as I expected

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Rich, famous, and jobless sounded awful – the worst kind of them-vs-us portrayal of poverty. When we were approached last year by the production company, asking if we’d help find unemployed people to feature, we turned them down. But the programme, shown over the last two days, has actually been quite impressive in illustrating some of the issues we come across every day.

In the first show the four ‘celebs’ (let’s be honest, we’d only ever heard of Larry Lamb), were given 4 days of Jobseekers Allowance (about £35), and told to find a job. In an incredibly artificial situation – followed by a camera and with only 4 days to work – they still learnt some important lessons. Not least the cruelty of the way wages are deducted from benefits, leaving people working for what seems like nothing. Neither of the two who found work were very keen to give back their ‘benefits’. They also realised quickly the difficulty of living on £65 a week, and the seemingly-small but almost insurmountable barriers that such low income presents – not being able to afford the bus fare to the interview, for example.

In last night’s show, they were packed off to various areas of the country to spend a few days living with people who were unemployed for a variety of reasons. It threw up some incongruous moments – Larry Lamb as marriage counsellor particularly stuck in my mind – but also some instructive lessons. The biggest of which is that each unemployed person, in their different ways, seemed to benefit hugely from a bit of personal attention from someone who cared. It wasn’t something they were getting at the Jobcentre.

The middle class elbows of one ‘celeb’ managed to get her host some work experience in a zoo (although where that’s leading is another matter). The dangerously severe approach of an Irish landscape gardener towards his hosts – a couple with 5 children living on benefits – betrayed his cringing lack of understanding of the barriers many people face, but even they seemed genuinely moved by his austere concern. And when Noel Gallagher’s ex-wife accompanied ex-offender Nick to the Jobcentre, she admitted their hostile approach towards him had almost turned her violent. No wonder Nick was struggling to find work, when that’s the kind of support he was getting.

At Community Links we have talked many times before about the importance of building meaningful relationships with individuals to really achieve change. These programmes illustrated well the two main problems with the benefits system. Its perverse financial disincentives to work in many situations, and the lack of personal support it provides to individuals for whom that could make all the difference. If these programmes have gone some way towards making that more obvious to the public, that can only be a good thing.

One point of concern – the way they seemed to leave the unemployed people they featured. The farewells were presented as emotional and final. I sincerely hope the television company wasn’t heartless enough to severely disrupt people’s lives for four days and then leave them high and dry.